Re: Some fedora devel inconsistencies...
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:18:26 +0200 (EET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le ven 14/11/2003 à 10:06, Panu Matilainen a écrit : > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > > > > Actually.. (hear a bell ringing.. looking up source...) you can easily > > > enable yum-like safe-mode on apt as well: just specify > > > "APT::Get::Remove=false" in apt.conf or as command line option and it'll > > > stop right there if an operation would remove something. > > > > In fact .. APT::Get::Remove=false in apt.conf or --no-remove on command > > line. > > Yum is worse than this. > It will block if an unrelated dep is not satisfied - with --no-remove > apt will block only if all the updates require a removal (I think - > didn't test it) Heh.. I think this is actually pretty amusing: apt will refuse to do anything if you have unrelated unsatisfied dep in your rpmdb (one of the top three complaints about apt and I agree there should be a switch to turn that off temporarily) but doesn't care about unsatisfied unrelated deps in repositories, with yum the situation is exactly the opposite :) - Panu - -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list