Re: Why is ide-scsi not provided in Arjan's 2.6 kernel?
Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:36:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
*moved to devel-list* Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> said: >>I hope to see a 2.4.x kernel in FC2 _too_. Otherwise it will be a lame >>distribution. > What would be lame about not including an old kernel? If 2.6 doesn't bring _all functional features_ that 2.4 has, it will be necessary a backup 2.4 kernel. Today must-fix.txt and should-fix.txt(PRI1) are big lists. > Including multiple kernel versions (especially from different major > release trains) greatly increases complexity for very little gain. Mandrake 9.2 and SuSE 9.0 bring 2.6 & 2.4 kernels. If they are able to do it, why not Fedora ? :-? -- HTML mails are going to trash automagically -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list