Re: tools or scripts for release engineering?
bishop <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:53:49 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric, That's something I'm interesting in reading as well. In addition, I'm looking forward to replicating, at home, whichever auto-build-from-CVS strategy Fedora chooses. My own system is okay, but it's small-time, it's got a whack of limitations and the workaround for them aren't pretty at all. I'm not sure of the license on our RPM-CVS add-on tools are, so I've hesitated on suggesting that (who's a python guru here?) for the collective. I almost wish I could get my hands on the release engineering routine one we used to use for work, but I'm sure that work would clamp some serious legal ain't-gonna-happen docs on it. Ideally, I'd love to see changes CVS building Rawhide packages, as well as a valid, installable update CD, maybe weekly. It was a goal we had at work for the longest time, spearheaded by Mr Terpstra himself for a while, too, even, but it lost the race. Bummer. But yeah, put my name down for any private responses to Eric's question. I want to be on the CC list to that stuff. - bish Eric Smith wrote: > Are there any tools or scripts for Fedora Core release engineering? > In other words, the stuff that takes a big collection of SRPMS, and > results in the ISO images? > > Failing that, is there some documentation on how it is done? > > I'm sure that with enough trial and error I could eventually come close > to duplicating the way it's done officially, but if there are tools > and/or docs, it's obviously much easier. > > Thanks! > Eric Smith > -- it seems like a dark day when an American citizen regards reading as a threat, and downright pitch-black when the federal government agrees. http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/2003-07-17/rant.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list