Re: docs-xml-tags.patch
Tammy Fox <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:36:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.docs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I finally had time to look at this patch. You are right about the changing eps and png to EPS and PNG and adds / to the end. I forgot to change that when I converted this doc from SGML to XML. In regards to the different types of figures, what is the advantage of using different declarations? If they look the same, I would prefer to stick to one to make the code as simple as possible. Tammy On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:29:44PM +0100, Gavin Henry wrote: > Here's the patch. > > All it does it change eps and png to EPS and PNG and adds / to the end, as I couldn't get your figure example to work without the above. I also added 2 other types of figures and added the bits of those that should be edited. > > This is my first patch and I did it work, so it only works when you say yes to the "Apply -R" bit. Sorry. > > Hope I got the other 2 types of figures right? > > Should I have put my name anywhere in the patch? > > -- > Regards, > > Gavin Henry. > > Trying to be a RHCE..... > http://www.magicfx.co.uk > http://www.suretecsystems.com -- fedora-docs-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list