Re: [OT] Linux leaders offer education discount

Matthew Saltzman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.general,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Ed Hill wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 03:18, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >   if that's the case, how many students are going to be interested
> > in the more stable but certainly older technology of RHEL on their
> > desktop?  to which release of RH does RHEL currently correspond?

RHEL 3.0 is pretty close to RH9+.

>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Probably quite a few grad students, post-docs, and professors will be
> interested.  Theres a lot of researchers using Linux for data reduction
> who really don't care about bleeding-edge stuff.  They just want a
> stable, secure, and up-2-date platform for their desktops, servers, and
> beowulf clusters.
>
> For instance, we have dozens of users matching that description in our
> department.

Another reason to stick with the slower-moving product is support for
commercial software.  I kind of doubt that we'll see products like Maple,
Matlab, Mathematica, SPlus, CPLEX, etc. staying fully current with a
fast-moving Fedora product.  They'll be supporting the OS that they can
get support for themselves, namely RHEL.  And they will be very happy with
the longer life cycle.

I haven't decided which way to go with my work machines, but this is an
excellent alternative for academics, and makes RHEL a very viable option
for me.

>
> Ed
>
>

-- 
		Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.