Re: Fedora as production server OS
Rickard Svoren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.general,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for this email Peter We are not in need for any external support services today, we have been using RHL since version 6.2 ( i found an old RHL 4.2 Box yesterday so there might be even longer :-). My main concern is security updates and stability, and of course upgrading 1-2 times a year is possible but not desirable. I have been looking at Suse, Debian and Slackware aswell but it seems like waste to change distro when we have RHL competence in our company. But we do not like to get jailed into Redhat's commersial train.... I guess i'm looking for some advices from people in the same situation. /Rickard At 10:26 2003-11-17 +0100, you wrote: >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Am Mo, den 17.11.2003 schrieb Rickard Svoren um 10:08: > > i am a bit courious if someone has started using fedora for example on an > > high volume > > mailserver (10000 users +) ? > >The problem are not the 10000 users + but the question how often you are >willing to upgrade the server (and how you get support if you need it). >Red Hat does not "guarantee" the security and bug fixes, but the >community including Red Hat will make them available. De facto it will >be the same in the short term, but what about the future? Fixes for a >Fedora release will be available about 3 months after the next release >(with 2-3 releases planned per year). So you have to update about 1-2 >times a year. > > > Is Fedora intended for such use or only for developers/ beta testers ? >Not only > > >Peter > > > > > > >-- >fedora-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list