Re: Freshrpms.net concerns.
Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:06:40 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.general,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Nov 2003 07:39:05 -0700, Bill Anderson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:15, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:15:22 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... > > > And that's what changelogs are for. > > > > What a great idea! :-/ Let package users search through spec changelogs to > > find out whether there's anything special about a package. Because you > > and me do that, it should not be *the* recommended way. > > > Actually, I think RPM itself should provide an option to get that > changelog out. Pardon? rpm --query --changelog PACKAGENAME exists already. The problem is, it doesn't contain end-user relevant entries. And if the package maintainer updates the package often or if the packaged software is huge, the size and number of spec changelog entries can be overwhelming. --
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/uPIW0iMVcrivHFQRAtaIAJ4hwTzFtpT/vN7Kxwfk6bXNmqVs4gCfTSYU k3w2qJKHj6tQVFqYxD2seYg= =Cg8K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----