Re: 5.0.1 Satellite and RHN Proxy released today

Daryl Herzmann wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Clifford Perry wrote:
>
>> Yes - this 5.0.1 RHN Proxy release does address this issue for RHEL 5 
>> clients using RHN Proxy, with custom channels. I think you are on the 
>> cc and so should have got the email notification of the bug being 
>> resolved.
>
> Wonderful!  I wasn't on that bz entry, but I think we are now still 
> waiting for yum plugin to be fixed?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249710
>
> It sounds like RHEL5u1 is still a month or more away from release?
>
> daryl
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
I did not test/qa nor devel this, but to my knowledge, the yum plugin 
part is not needed for 5.0 RHN Proxy to work, though would be for RHN 
Proxy 4.2.

Also, we modified the rhn-package-manager command to correctly calculate 
start/end values for package headers, so that if you re-upload a custom 
package it will have the right values and the 5.0.1 RHN Proxy will 
correctly download the package.

So, if you have a 5.0.1 RHN Proxy, a re-upload of the package to the 
custom channel, *should* resolve the issue.

Reviewing the Release Notes (which I did review before being released), 
it seems we are lacking here - for clarity :( Sorry.

Cliff

-- 
Clifford Perry
Team Lead, Satellite Sustaining Engineering
Red Hat, Inc. 
http://www.redhat.com/
+1 919 754 4403
RHCE# 803004507210710