Re: Packages missing in F14

Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 23:45 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>> > I had no problem building avidemux and mppdec (required by gnormalize)
>> > here ...
>>
>> I also had no issues on x86_64, but on i386 (where assembly code is
>> being built) they fail with
>>
>> /var/tmp/repot-build/BUILD/avidemux_2.5.3/avidemux/ADM_coreImage/src/ADM_vidFieldASM.cpp:
>> Assembler messages:
>> /var/tmp/repot-build/BUILD/avidemux_2.5.3/avidemux/ADM_coreImage/src/ADM_vidFieldASM.cpp:108:
>> Error: unsupported for `movq'
>> make[2]: ***
>> [avidemux/ADM_coreImage/src/CMakeFiles/ADM_coreImage.dir/ADM_vidFieldASM.cpp.o]
>> Error 1
>>
>> and
>>
>> nasm -f elf cpu_feat.nas -o cpu_feat.o -l cpu_feat.lst
>> tools.inc:79: error: `%$STACK': context stack is empty
>> cpu_feat.nas:37: warning: Unknown section attribute 'class' ignored on
>> declaration of section `.text'
>> cpu_feat.nas:37: warning: Unknown section attribute 'use32' ignored on
>> declaration of section `.text'
>> make: *** [cpu_feat.o] Error 1
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qMqrqS (%build)
>>
>> I think the latter is due to nasm 2.09, I've seen the error in other
>> projects, too.
>> --
>>
>>
>
> Can you try this one? Maybe it works ...
>
> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.5.3-24.fc12.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.5.3-24.fc12.src.rpm>
>
>
>
>

Also, this mppdec new version uses yasm instead of nasm,
and compiles just fine on F14 i686:

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mppdec-r96-4.fc12.src.rpm


The avidemux I sent you before, also compiles just fine
on F14 i686. However, I do not have a 32 bit system to test it .....


-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.