Re: video4linux updates

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:21 -0200, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello Alex,
> 
> Sorry, Axel.

NP.

> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> [I'm Ccing Douglas who has taken the cape for maintaining the backports
> >>  tree for v4l-dvb. If your reply is intended for Douglas as well, please
> >>  Cc him as well in your replies, I don't think he's on the list]
> >>
> >> So in order to see if it makes a difference for building mythtv on RHEL5
> >> (for Douglas: we have build problems against the videodev headers) I did
> >> package up the latest contents of the v4l-dvb backports tree (last
> >> changes are from July, 2nd). After some patching for taking care of the
> >> RHEL5 kernel (which is something between 2.6.18 and 2.6.2x, e.g. based
> >> on 2.6.18 with many backports), the build succeeds. Still mythtv is not
> >> happy with its videodev*.h headers and bails out.
> >>
> >> The backport does not build on f12-f14 and RHEL6 (kernels 2.6.35.6,
> >> 2.6.34.7, 2.6.32.23 and 2.6.32).
> >>
> >> For the lovers of mythtv on RHEL5, please test the package build with
> >> the 20100702 build of video4linux. You will find similar errors to the
> >> 20100401 build, but you now know that you have the latest headers. If
> >> you want to suggest changes to the contents of videodev*.h as before
> >> please Cc Douglas.
> >>
> >> Douglas, do you could advise us on how to get mythtv built against v4l
> >> on EL5? There are many users that have asked for it and the build
> >> stumbles on both the vendor supplied v4l headers as well as the
> >> backport's headers.
> >> Also do you think you could update the backports tree? I'd be happy to
> >> to the build testing and there are many users at ATrpms that can provide
> >> feedback on the resulting drivers. Thanks!
> >
> > Currently, I am not the backport maintainer and there is a new
> > backport tree:
> >        git://linuxtv.org/media_build.git
> >
> > The new build system is a improvement from the last backport tree idea.
> > Basically, it's a .tar file from the current -git tree which is
> > updated regularly.
> >
> > For while, this new tree is able to compile until 2.6.31.

I tried under 2.6.35.6-48.fc14, 2.6.34.7-61.fc13, 2.6.32.23-170.fc12 and
2.6.32-71.7.1.el6, all Fedora/RHEL kernels and they fail on

v4l/bttv-input.c: In function 'init_bttv_i2c_ir':
v4l/bttv-input.c:395:3: error: too many arguments to function 'i2c_new_probed_device'
include/linux/i2c.h:288:1: note: declared here

It can be an issue with patched kernels from the distribution vendor,
but especially Fedora has been trying to keep as close to upstream as
possible.

> > I just back from a long business trip, I will try to help with kernels
> > < 2.6.31 but
> > cannot provide you any date.

Alone the fact that there will be backports is making many users
happy. :)

If you need any testing, I can rebuild & report on any later git version
you tell me.
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkz1RwwACgkQQBVS1GOamfGYXQCfemhuMmp/3BkIQMOmEgp3VAaL
V4UAn0MAq4usg3RfuJ/Ib0KqEgVwHVfX
=rhYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.