Re: New vlc 1.1.6

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 10:54 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > There is a new vlc available:
>
> Thanks! In the queue!
>
> > Also, avidemux 2.5.4-28 does not run because of a Qt missing symbol.
> > Probably it was linked against Qt 4.7.
>
> It was for EL5 and EL6.
>
> > There is no need to use Qt 4.7 yet.
>
> I think I needed it for EL5, you are probably referring to RHEL6?
>

Yes, rhel6. qt47 is in testing there, and avidemux should be linked to qt
4.6.2, I guess...


>
> > Another one, gstreamer plugins bad only produces a dvd plugin if we
> > use libdvdnav 4.1.4 from F12. Why are you using version 0.1.10?
>
> I don't really like what happened to libdvdnav, it has a stray homepage
> on 0.1.10, probably abandoned by the previous authors w/o passing the
> torch to anyone and the new team around mplayer seems to tries to keep
> up a semi-announced fork.
>
> But this situation is that way for some years, and seems to become the
> defacto setup, so I'll just rebuild Fedora's version and then rebuild
> the gstreamer plugins.
>

I only had problem with the full gstreamer-plugins-bad, which ATrpms does
not supply (but it provides gstfaac, for playing mp4 files):

This is the plugin that did not build on rhel6:

/usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libresindvd.so   <-------

I built all the missing packages for gstreamer-plugins-bad and vlc.

 gmyth-devel-0.7.1-11.el6.1.x86_64.rpm
 gmyth-0.7.1-11.el6.1.x86_64.rpm
 amrwb-devel-7.0.0.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 amrwb-7.0.0.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libmimic-devel-1.0.4-4.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libmimic-1.0.4-4.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libofa-devel-0.9.3-16.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libofa-0.9.3-16.el6.x86_64.rpm
 lv2core-devel-4.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 lv2core-4.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 slv2-devel-0.6.6-6.el6.x86_64.rpm
 slv2-0.6.6-6.el6.x86_64.rpm
 celt-devel-0.7.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 celt-0.7.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.19-16.el6.x86_64.rpm
 gstreamer-plugins-bad-devel-0.10.19-16.el6.x86_64.rpm
 openslp-server-1.2.1-14.el6.x86_64.rpm
 openslp-devel-1.2.1-14.el6.x86_64.rpm
 openslp-1.2.1-14.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libopendaap-devel-0.4.0-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
 libopendaap-0.4.0-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
 Glide3-devel-20050815-10.el6.x86_64.rpm
 Glide3-20050815-10.el6.x86_64.rpm



>
> > Finally, you disabled musepack-tools-devel because mplayer does not
> > compile with it.
>
> I didn't disable it, it is still there. What I did was to defuse the
> drop-in replacement of libmpcdec-devel since musepack is neither
> claiming to be API, nor ABI backward compatible to libmpcdec. Looking at
> the sources it looks like the developers even intend for users to be
> able to coinstall both.
>
> > Mplayer does not play sv8 mpc files anyway, but vlc could, if it used
> > the appropriate
> > devel package (libmpcdec-devel = 1.2.7, from the original
> > musepack-tools-devel).
>
> Have you tried it? If it does work, then why not use a direct BR on
> musepack-tools-devel?
>
>
You commented the include bits:

#%{_includedir}/mpcdec

Vlc compiles fine with sv8.



-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ