Re: New blender available

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:42 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 11:46 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>         http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/blender-2.49b-22.fc14.src.rpm

>         Thanks! BTW it does not build on F15, looks like some implicit
>         [...]
> F15 is shipping blender 2.56, which is not considered stable yet.

That happens from time to time: Some packagers hope that the package
will be out of beta once the current Fedora spin gets released and
sometimes they stay in beta. The problem is that Fedora has no other
place to put experimental packages, e.g. something like bleeding.

> By the way, your macros do not include .pyo and .pyc in the packages.,
> opposed to Fedora.
> 
> Of course, the packages become smaller, but if the dates are correct,
> those bytecode files should increase the performance, or this is
> irrelevant?

I'm not sure what I have done to make rpm not package what it would
normally package (?). I'm using native rpm as much as possible, does
this happen on f14, too?
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk1RAMkACgkQQBVS1GOamfHmCACfYDQjN0cceWh0iSWGw9V83RdF
X80An2Zn+k7N0MPLdC+JHJCkdXPlE1nf
=AMbh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----