Re: New blender available

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:42 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >         On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 11:46 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>>> >
>>> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/blender-2.49b-22.fc14.src.rpm
>>>
>>> >         Thanks! BTW it does not build on F15, looks like some implicit
>>> >         [...]
>>> > F15 is shipping blender 2.56, which is not considered stable yet.
>>>
>>> That happens from time to time: Some packagers hope that the package
>>> will be out of beta once the current Fedora spin gets released and
>>> sometimes they stay in beta. The problem is that Fedora has no other
>>> place to put experimental packages, e.g. something like bleeding.
>>>
>>
>> The ptrdiff bug is also there. I think it just needs to be "typefef
>> typename",
>> but I did not tried it yet.
>>
>
>
> In fact, it is a bunch of missing
>
>  #include <stddef.h>
>
>
>
I have a version that compiles either for F14 or F15:

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/blender-2.56-8.fc14.src.rpm

However, it does require python3.

For F14, you should use

--without py32

because F14 only has python3-3.1. In this case, I disabled the bytecompile
because
it seems to be broken on python3-3.1, anyway.

You can push it to testing, because it is not considered a stable version
yet.

Thanks.

-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ