Re: New libva

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:51 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> this new version installs cleanly and does not have a single patch:
> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libva-1.0.12-5.fc14.src.rpm

Nice, thanks!

> libva 1.0.10 is part of F15 now, and therefore we took the right
> decision when we started to use it.

Well, whether something in Fedora is a correct decision depends highly
on the packager. Recently some package (I forget which, but it's in the
list somewhere) just changed all it soname symbols w/o any other change
(!).

> Maybe your drm patch still applies, but I am really not sure whether
> it is better not to use a newer drm ...

The newer drm seems to cause problems (there was a bug report on some
driver even crashing), so it is not a drop in replacement, if we were to
continue to enforce the drm update we would have to rebuild everything
built against it and test at least on the three major graphic hardware
vendors.
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk2ycxIACgkQQBVS1GOamfHBmgCeI+b8p2/b5zVyQweuPhZ8s5XJ
sBoAoIf0voEz0fZngVLTMx0OnwJtbZJ+
=aXNZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.