Re: New alsa-driver for rhel6

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:21 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:

>         I see what is happening. F12 and F13 also use kernel 2.6.32.
>         However, their kernels have not been patched by RedHat.
>         
>         Therefore, the adriver patch should not be applied to F12 and
>         F13.
>         The simplest way is adding a bcond something. Nonetheless, F12
>         is dead
>         and F13 is going to die soon. Should we just let them rest in
>         peace??  

It also affects all RHEL5 kernels but the very latest. RHEL is a slow
upgrading platform for most users, so the support of at least a few
kernels is a must.

> Axel, I did not have any problem creating the i686 version for rhel6
> with mock: [...]
> There must be something at your side ...

This is normal, if the x86_64 builds fail the other archs are not even
tried in the default build mode. I initiated a i386 build which at least
produced the package for the latest kernel. Still the package should ATM
also build on the non patched kernels. I didn't have time to find a good
fix, but it doesn't sound too difficult.
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk3h+lkACgkQQBVS1GOamfHAdgCfVDMS+XBX6fFKBwFRtSBZqX0y
YhcAniZAV8GwX4ojuWUhAKhMGwfP5Stg
=bFpH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.