Re: [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64
Brian Long <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:38:59 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANzVr1YMjJ46Xc98h59E6h2dtrhOXecfvULFy8_bri9mRtiBPg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:18 AM, George Galt <[email protected]> wrote: > Paulo: > > Thanks. I've installed it and it seems to be working (FYI, I'm still on > FC16 x86_64, for anyone who is wondering if it works on that distribution). > > On addressing the conflict, I'm not sure that same filtering will work, > but simply adding a rm -f {path}/nvidia-cuda-proxy to the pre-install macro > might work. The only problem is that there is no recovery if the rest of > the install fails. I suppose you could move it to a nividia-cuda-proxy.old > file and alert the user as a recoverable alternative, but that might create > other issues. I'm just not experienced enough with building RPMs to know > which would be the best course. > > Thanks for all of your work on this driver. Hopefully I can be of more > help in the future. If this file is to be contained in each versioned set of RPMs, maybe it should be renamed and versioned as the kmdl is and have a symlink changed with nvidia-graphics-switch. /Brian/