Re: [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On 12/12/2012 06:00 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:42 AM, O&M Ugarcina <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     On 06/12/12 19:39, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
>
>         On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>__> wrote:
>
>              Paulo:
>
>              I get a conflict with:
>              Transaction Check Error:
>                file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-__control from install of
>              nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-__151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file
>              from package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-__149.fc16.x86_64
>                file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-__server from install of
>              nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-__151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file
>              from package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-__149.fc16.x86_64
>
>              I got the same error when I tried to install the 304.64 driver
>              (I'm on the 304.51 driver).  I believe that the 304.51 driver
>              introduced these files (they weren't in the 302 driver).  What is
>              the appropriate way to handle this?  I'm sure I could simply
>              ignore the error, but for those who want a clean install (or to
>              leave legacy drivers installed in case they need to return to
>              them), we might want to fix this issue too.
>
>              Sorry to be a PITA!
>
>
>         This was happening before.
>         nvidia-cuda-proxy-control is a new file, which appeared
>         in the 300 series. Since it is unversioned, and the previous package
>         is not being removed, the conflict appears.
>
>         We can either supply it in a separate package, or just
>         filter it as we did with libnvcuvid.so
>
>         In the next package, I will deal with this issue. For now,
>         just use "sudo rpm -Uvh --force ...."
>         .19-151.el6.x86_64
>
>
>     I just had to force it in , with --nodeps option , so far seems to be working ok .
>
>
>     Best Regards
>
>     Milorad
>
>
>
> This is because the macros I used to filter the "required"
> should not be available for centos/rhel.
>
> I have no solution for that...

Paulo, I would expect those macros to be available for RHEL6 and modern Fedora, just leaving RHEL5 with issues?