Re: dovecot

>>
>> I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good
>> shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile
>> there...
>
> probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of
> packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't
> looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they
> will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos.

That is a fact that I can follow 100%, but there are a number of 
packages that has not been available (compiled) for f18. Among them is 
gstreamer-plugins-ugly, spamassassin and avidemux.


Regards
Kim