Re: dovecot spec
Kim Bisgaard <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:43:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Looking in BUILDROOT:
ls -l BUILDROOT/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x. 5 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59 dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386
drwxr-xr-x. 2 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59 dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386%{_tmpfilesdir}
Does not look like _tmpfilesdir is set :-(
I have remembered that tmpfilesdir should be set to /etc/tmpfiles.d :-)
I have this installed:
atrpms-rpm-config-203-1.noarch
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-06-26 11:19, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in 2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is currently
> no new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old Pigeonhole.
>
> I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran into this error:
> Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
> error: File must begin with "/": %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
> + cd dovecot-2.2.4
> + DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
> + export DOCDIR
> + /usr/bin/mkdir -p /home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
> + cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config docinstall/mkcert.sh
> docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
> /home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
> + exit 0
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> File must begin with "/": %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
>
>
> It seems to come from these lines:
> %if %{with systemd}
> %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
> %{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
> %{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
> %else
>
>
> But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest macros? I
> have tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is on FC17.
>
> Hope you can shed some light...
>
> Regards,
> Kim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel