Re: ATrpms Status Update?
John Pilkington <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: <snip> > > It might be easier to look at the repo: > > http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-x86___64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-__graphics302.17-kmdl-3.4.3-1.__fc17-302.17-146.fc17.x86_64.__rpm > <http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics302.17-kmdl-3.4.3-1.fc17-302.17-146.fc17.x86_64.rpm> > > > http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-x86___64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-__graphics295.59-kmdl-3.4.3-1.__fc17-295.59-146.fc17.x86_64.__rpm > <http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics295.59-kmdl-3.4.3-1.fc17-295.59-146.fc17.x86_64.rpm> > > and to thank Axel again! > > There isn't a full set, but these should get you in business. > > John P > > > > But this set has the problem of requiring modutils >= 2.4.14, > which was obsoleted by kmod. > > Trying to force the installation module-init-tools brings a lot of > inconsistencies > to the system... > > kmod seems to only have suppressed /sbin/weak-modules > and added /usr/bin/kmod. > > Axel, is it possible to change the dependencies into the kmdls? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti > DCC - UFRJ > Pity about that. I'm using the repo version of 295.59 in f16.x86_64 without seeing problems. Not using VDPAU. Haven't tried 302.17 yet. John P