Re: Thoughts on myth 0.26
Paul Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP6c-yzNdOGWb0ov_o78CJJgcOjCgY=83ZEs6JgvX1VXssEFBQ@mail.gmail.com> |
forgot to mention on using F17 on 32bit version ie http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-i386/atrpms/stable/ The reason I'm a bit reluctant is the response time to fix seems a bit variable lately so as this is my WAF production box I'm not going to rush in... Paul On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Grant McChesney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, John Pilkington <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 25/10/12 18:41, Kirk Bocek wrote: >> >>> >>> On 10/24/2012 7:39 PM, Paul wrote: >>> >>>> I can see MythTV 0.26 is now available ... thanks >>>> >>>> Has anyone installed it yet?.. any issues ? >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>> >>> On the el6 side, only 0.24.3 and 0.24.2 are available. >>> >>> http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_**64/atrpms/stable/<http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/> >>> >>> >> I mentioned this on mythtv users, but it might be useful here. >> >> There's a mythweb package for 0.26. If it's used with mythtv 0.25 the >> programme times are wrong because 0.26 uses UTC and 0.25 uses local time. >> >> But also, the changelog of the mythweb 0.26 shows a simultaneous build of >> mythweb 0.25.3. This hasn't appeared in the repo, and all packages for >> 0.25* have disappeared. I suppose this means that there was a problem - >> and we must hope that Axel will sort it out :-) >> >> John P >> >> >> >> >> >> > Well, that explains my mythweb time problem recently. Time to downgrade > it. Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > atrpms-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users > _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users