Re: [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general
Message-ID <CAMgUmn=hCbTMoPwR0XJrwAZ1eOJ+vp2VcUGzCdZPHyYo4r-OOg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Paulo:
>
> I get a conflict with:
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control from install of
> nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from
> package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc16.x86_64
>   file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server from install of
> nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from
> package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc16.x86_64
>
> I got the same error when I tried to install the 304.64 driver (I'm on the
> 304.51 driver).  I believe that the 304.51 driver introduced these files
> (they weren't in the 302 driver).  What is the appropriate way to handle
> this?  I'm sure I could simply ignore the error, but for those who want a
> clean install (or to leave legacy drivers installed in case they need to
> return to them), we might want to fix this issue too.
>
> Sorry to be a PITA!
>
>
This was happening before.
nvidia-cuda-proxy-control is a new file, which appeared
in the 300 series. Since it is unversioned, and the previous package
is not being removed, the conflict appears.

We can either supply it in a separate package, or just
filter it as we did with libnvcuvid.so

In the next package, I will deal with this issue. For now,
just use "sudo rpm -Uvh --force ...."


-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.