Re: Mythtv 0.26
John Pilkington <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/12/12 10:55, John Pilkington wrote: > On 11/12/12 09:03, Collier Family wrote: >> I now have this on my frontend as well. >> >> I now have rpms for 6.3 x86_64, x386 and F17 x386 >> >> If anyone wants a copy I can add them to the dropbox. >> >> I've used atrpms for many years - thanks a lot Axel. >> >> Its just a little I can give back. >> >> Cheers >> Stephen >> > > Thanks for posting this. If there are significant differences, yes > please. I'm afraid I haven't yet tried to use your rpms, and hadn't in > fact noticed that my el6 box is i686 flavour while you said you were > running x86_64. > > I took the liberty of posting a link on the myth-users list, where (and > on myth-dev) there have been threads about CentOS 6 difficulties. I > figured that since the info was already on this list it wouldn't do any > harm to have it there too. Hope you don't get too many cries for help :-) > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/534985#534985 > > Thanks again, > > John P Stephen: Many thanks, again, for making these available - and for the updating instructions. I now have the source etc packages. One thing I noticed is that you have continued Axel's version sequence, just as I did when I contrived a build for 0.25-something. When Axel's next set of packages emerged they had the same version number and didn't appear to be upgrades. It made installing them messy. Perhaps off-main-sequence builds ought to have a X.X version number? I only just realised that your later post above is offering binary packages as well as the srpms etc that you listed earlier. I haven't looked very hard but I haven't been able to view the dropbox directory structure. Cheers, John P