Re: Centos 6 YUM advice please

Ken Smith <[email protected]> Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:17:03 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Ken Smith<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> {snip}  I gave the command:-
>>>
>>>   yum install mythtv-0.24.3-284.1.el6.x86_64   --enablerepo=atrpms
>>>
>>> There seems to be an issue with the themes package as below:-
>>>
>>> {snip lots of output}
>>> -->  Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>
>
> {snip}
>>> Error: Package: mythtv-0.24.3-284.1.el6.x86_64 (atrpms)
>>>             Requires: myththemes
>>>             Available: myththemes-0.23.1-167.noarch (atrpms)
>>>                 myththemes = 0.23.1-167
>>>             Available: myththemes-0.24-177.noarch (atrpms)
>>>                 myththemes = 0.24-177
>>>
>>> I am doing something the wrong way?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Ken
>> Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>> When I update my 0.24.3 hosts I need to add "--exclude=\*0.25\* 
>>> --exclude=\*0.26\*" to avoid including the other two newer trees. 
>>> Maybe that would help.
>
> Good idea. I'll try that. Thank you
>
> Ken
>

I've tried that fix and made some progress. The command I used was

yum install mythtv-0.24.3-284.1.el6.x86_64   --enablerepo=atrpms  
--exclude=\*0.25\* --exclude=\*0.26\*

Along the way its resolving the dependences it reports

Mythweather needs Perl XML::SAX::Base

In the resolution of the Perl dependencies it decides it needs:-

  perl-XML-SAX                   noarch  0.96-7.el6                
base     78 k
  perl-XML-SAX-Base              noarch  1.04-3.el6                
atrpms   22 k


And the install finally errors like this:-

Transaction Check Error:
   file /usr/share/man/man3/XML::SAX::Base.3pm.gz conflicts between 
attempted installs of perl-XML-SAX-Base-1.04-3.el6.noarch and 
perl-XML-SAX-0.96-7.el6.noarch
   file /usr/share/man/man3/XML::SAX::Exception.3pm.gz conflicts between 
attempted installs of perl-XML-SAX-Base-1.04-3.el6.noarch and 
perl-XML-SAX-0.96-7.el6.noarch

Digging into the content of the two .rpm files, its right. The two 
packages conflict.

Any suggestions most welcome.

Thanks

Ken




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.