Re: Myth 026 on Centos 6.4

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:31:38AM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> 
> 
> Ken Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Kirk Bocek wrote:
> >>
> >> Ken Smith<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>    
> >>> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>> {snip}
> >>> Just taken the machine down to 0.25. Its fine. This hardware has
> >also
> >>> run 0.24 OK as well.
> >>>
> >>> I'll try with 0.26 another time
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> :-) Ken
> >>>      
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing this Ken. I've had my eye on an 0.26 CentOS 6
> >upgrade for awhile. Thanks for taking the bullet.
> >>
> >>    
> >To be fair that's just my experience on this hardware. If 0.26 had real
> >
> >problems the myth-users list would be full of threads about it and the 
> >effort would be going in to 0.26 fixes not 0.27 alpha.
> >
> >Ken
> 

> Well sometimes I feel like the ATrpms variety can have its own
> peccadillos. :) Especially with CentOS.

I checked the builds of 0.25 and 0.26 for EL6 and there are no
differences in the environmental setup and the checkings.

You can recheck in a day or so. As I wanted to remove the PyXML/jamu
dependencies I have to rebuild the packages and both 0.25 and 0.26 had
some fixes since the last June floating in, so I'm doing a fresh
rebase.

There will also be some 0.27 alpha/beta packages for the brave.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net