Re: mythtv-0.27/0.28 for EL6

Kenneth Brun Nielsen <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:14:03 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general
Message-ID <CAFBqBOSBn7oaSD4ngnE2qkir7r+urvGsaV4-7OMCFEH-5x1rmA@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 December 2013 01:20, James Szinger <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:45:16 +0100
> Kenneth Brun Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'm very interested in this too.
> >
> > On my current EL6 installation, I use Mythweb 0.27 and Mythtv backend
> > 0.26 (this is the obvious result of "yum update" in atrpms). This
> > difference gives some annoying behaviour (mainly presentation).
> >
> > In case, it is not planned to upgrade the atrpms repo to mythbackend
> > 0.27, can I downgrade mythweb, or is that like asking for trouble
> > (database format has changed AFAIK).
>
> mythweb-0.26 is still in the repository, so you should be able to yum
> downgrade mythweb.  The database format is tied to the backend, so I
> think this should be safe.
>
>
Jim, I tried downgrading, but it wasn't that straightforward After
downgrade of mythweb, the page complained: "Current database version of 4
is newer than the code base version 3".

However, after a few iterations, I located a parameter within database
table "settings" named "WebDBSchemaVer". I changed this from 4 to 3, and so
far it works. But I guess this is not the only thing, that has changed in
the DB, so I wouldnt recommend other to try it without having a deeper
insight, than I have.

/Kenneth

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users