Re: ATrpms repo status?

I really cannot answer this question. I had to build myself most of the
packages for F20, either x86_64 or i686. Some of the dependencies were also
too old and had to be upgraded first. A lot of work, but I have a usable
and very stable installation now...

I do not know what are Axel's plans. Only him can state the fate of the
site.




On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Kirk Bocek <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 3/13/2014 8:35 AM, BIRD Neil wrote:
>
>>    What's the current state of affairs for ATrpms?   There doesn't seem
>> to have been much activity since January (either on the list, or the repo.,
>> e.g., missing el6.5-i386, F20-x64 updates but not i386).
>>
>>    Is there still life in it?
>>
>>
> Good question. Interested users want to know. :)
>
> Personally for myself I dropped i386 usage with my shift from el5 to el6.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>



-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users