Re: mythtv 0.27.1

On 10/07/2014 20:14, Collier Family wrote:
> On 1/07/2014 6:45 pm, Duncan Brown wrote:
>> On 01/07/2014 00:25, judithc wrote:
>>> The new source is only if there is a new version. Such as 27.2. This 
>>> is because the source is expected to be at mythtv-${version} and 
>>> extracting the source and moving the base directory and retar was 
>>> not a good look. Creating a new source was simpler. There was a bug 
>>> in the original attempt that did an incorrect version comparison and 
>>> created one for every commit but that was fixed and commits will 
>>> patch as normal.
>>>
>>> I hope that makes sense.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>> Ah OK, I only skimmed it and thought it was doing it each time, that 
>> makes sense though
>>
>> I'm getting an error doing a --rebuild on your 27.2 srpm on el6, any 
>> ideas?
>>
>> /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/mythtv-0.27.2/mythplugins-0.27.2/mytharchive/mytharchivehelper/main.cpp:1006: 
>> undefined reference to `MythCoreContext::GetMasterServerPort()'
>> /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/mythtv-0.27.2/mythplugins-0.27.2/mytharchive/mytharchivehelper/main.cpp:1006: 
>> undefined reference to `MythCoreContext::GetMasterServerIP()'
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[2]: *** [mytharchivehelper] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory 
>> `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/mythtv-0.27.2/mythplugins-0.27.2/mytharchive/mytharchivehelper'
>> make[1]: *** [sub-mytharchivehelper-make_default] Error 2
>> make[1]: Leaving directory 
>> `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/mythtv-0.27.2/mythplugins-0.27.2/mytharchive'
>> make: *** [sub-mytharchive-make_default] Error 2
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TflHvR (%build)
>>
>>
>>
>> t
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
> I am sorry for not replying earlier, I have been away, my phone didn't 
> seem to like replying to emails.
>
> Is this still a problem?  There seems to be a lot of activity on the 
> mythtv git so updates are becoming very frequent.
>
> Cheers
> Stephen
All sorted now, it didn't seem to like building without having a 
previous version installed at the time.

Either way, I've done a complete rebuild since with Centos 7, and it 
built fine on there (after having to build most of the dependencies from 
f19/20 src rpms)


cheers

Dunc

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users