Re: new nvidia long term 346.35

Here is the errors from the log :

Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: Child process 1100 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc systemd: Started Wait for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit.
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2954 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052607 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2960 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051834 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc avahi-daemon[988]: Registering new address record 
for fe80::5246:5dff:fe50:b5ca on enp5s0.*.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2966 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.257969 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2972 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052946 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2979 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.266998 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send 
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") 
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error 
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" 
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave 
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc NetworkManager[983]: <info> Policy set 'enp5s0' 
(enp5s0) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2993 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion 
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051764 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: maximum number of X 
display failures reached: check X server log for errors



On 20/01/15 14:17, mo.ucina wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> I just loaded nvidia-graphics346.35-346.35-172.el7.x86_64 and can not 
> boot into graphic mode at all . There may be some other things in 
> there as well . I am going to fall back to 169 .
>
> Best Regards
>
> Milorad
>
> On 20/01/15 09:41, Stephen Collier wrote:
>> Thanks I'll make the changes.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network
>>
>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: NullDev<[email protected]>  </div><div>Date:20/01/2015  8:26 AM  (GMT+10:00) </div><div>To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net"<[email protected]>  </div><div>Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 </div><div>
>> </div>I had similar issues.  I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem went away:
>>
>> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> ../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
>>
>> and
>>
>> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
>> 	Derek Burt	Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM
>> [email protected]
>> On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote:
>>> Hello Stephen,
>>>
>>> Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits .
>>> On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for
>>> el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted the 171
>>> release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on mythtv .
>>> Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have
>>> fallen back to 169 for the time being .
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Milorad
>>>
>> Milorad,
>>
>> I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem OK. There
>> may be something different as they are created in a completely different
>> way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if I can
>> find any more differences between 169 and 171.
>>
>> On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check the script.
>>
>> I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64.  I had to move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the .58 packages and move some symlinks to get everything working again.  My apologies but I didn't document exactly what the issue was, was just trying to get the frontend running again and didn't take good notes :(  Sufficed to say, some of the vdpau related files had changed locations, etc.  Other than vdpau, everything seems to be running okay now.
>>
>> Derek
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users  mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
>>
>> Thanks I'll make the changes.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: NullDev
>> Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00)
>> To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net"
>> Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35
>>
>> I had similar issues.  I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem 
>> went away:
>>
>> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> 
>> ../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
>>
>> and
>>
>> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
>>> Derek Burt <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>>     On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote:
>>>     > Hello Stephen,
>>>     >
>>>     > Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time
>>>     permits .
>>>     > On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65
>>>     drivers for
>>>     > el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted
>>>     the 171
>>>     > release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on
>>>     mythtv .
>>>     > Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have
>>>     > fallen back to 169 for the time being .
>>>     >
>>>     > Best Regards
>>>     > Milorad
>>>     >
>>>     Milorad,
>>>
>>>     I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem
>>>     OK. There
>>>     may be something different as they are created in a completely
>>>     different
>>>     way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if
>>>     I can
>>>     find any more differences between 169 and 171.
>>>
>>>     On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check
>>>     the script.
>>>
>>>
>>> I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64.  
>>> I had to move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the 
>>> .58 packages and move some symlinks to get everything working 
>>> again.  My apologies but I didn't document exactly what the issue 
>>> was, was just trying to get the frontend running again and didn't 
>>> take good notes :(  Sufficed to say, some of the vdpau related files 
>>> had changed locations, etc.  Other than vdpau, everything seems to 
>>> be running okay now.
>>>
>>> Derek
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>