Re: question on spec file "%kmdl"
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:30:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:44:18AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 2/10/08, Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > [email protected] skrev, on 10-02-2008 12:46: > > > > > I'm trying to rebuild some src rpms that I d/l'ed from atrpms. > > > > > > Their spec files have a "%kmdl" directive in them. > > > > > > how might I handle this ? Install atrpms-rpm-config. As well as any kernel headers/sources you need to build kmdls for. > I've run into this many times. My solution is avoid ATRPMs at all > cost. AT created his own rpm macro scheme and unless you install his > devel packages, you will have trouble. So I avoid them. What's wrong with defining macros? Nowadays even cmake defines its own macros (nothing against cmake or its macros), and a more complex setup like kernel modules is in need for abstaction even more so. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFHr2zpQBVS1GOamfERAtblAJjDfqzxlbwWMl+lPR07Z7W2D3gkAJoCULm8 9YFEG/jU0h788UVj2jNI2A== =cFYX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----