Re: Experiences of apt vs grab

Dan Harris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.grab
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I had to ctrl-c a download at one point and I got "Cought signal ... ",  Maybe 
you fixed it already :)

-Dan

On Friday 05 April 2002 12:53 pm, Greg Kurtzer wrote:
> Thanks for the compliments... I too am torn from GRAB and APT. Simply
> because I maintain and wrote GRAB does not mean I think is the best for all
> situations. As far as the limitations of GRAB go, please let me know if you
> can think of an alternative, I am at a loss witht eh deps issue.
>
> Also where do you see the 'cought'? I just searched the source, and did not
> find it?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:40:09AM -0700, Dan Harris wrote:
> > Greg & all,
> >
> > I thought I'd give apt for rpm a shot last week just for fun.  The short
> > version is that I'm back to using grab again :)  Here's why..
> >
> > apt-rpm
> > =======
> > PROS:
> > Very simple syntax (apt-get install)
> > transparent handling of dependencies (almost)
> > all rpm's are in a managed format in a centralized location
> >
> > CONS:
> > all of the rpm's I tried to install were outdated and seemed to be the
> > "boxed" RH rpms
> > the rpm repositories at tuxfamily.org were VERY slow over the 2 week
> > period I tried it (14KB/sec download on my T1, come on!)
> > always complained that seemingly "everything" needed PERL.  Which I did
> > have installed from source, but it complained since it didn't see it in
> > the repository.
> >
> > In closing, I'd like to say that I really do like how easy it is to
> > 'apt-get install' something. But the downside is that the rpm's must be
> > controlled strictly and that seems to negate their 'freshness' as someone
> > must manage a single archive.  I also really liked the dependency fetch. 
> > Grab tries to get dependencies but it feels 'messy' every time I have to
> > go through it.  Too many choices to make each time, and if one fails, the
> > whole thing seems to blow up rather inelegantly.. But, I know this is the
> > downside of working with poorly managed RPM archives and it's mostly not
> > your fault, Greg.
> >
> > Anyway,  keep up the good work.  I'm really glad you're still keeping the
> > effort alive.  I'll continue to use it as long as I am using RPM's..
> >
> > One more thing....   s/cought/caught/g  :)
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Grab mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.runlevelzero.net/mailman/listinfo/grab
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.