Re: --status flag

Done... Check out 1.0.5pre11. Benchmarks ended up being the same (within .1 
sec) which is obviously close enough.

I would like to release tomorrow. Please let me know if there are any leftover
problems that need addressing.

Greg

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:36:44PM -0700, Greg Kurtzer wrote:
> Hrmm... Never thought of having more then one status. It may slow things down
> a bit because I will then be comparing in a conditonal a regex rather then a
> eq.
> 
> It should be able to be done pretty easily though... Let me do it and run some
> benchmarks and get back to you.
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 10:49:11AM -0400, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> > does the status option allow you to specify more than one status type at
> > the same time?  I would like to look for 2 specific status types at the
> > same time...anyway I can convince you to allow comma delimited list of
> > options to the --status flag?
> > 
> > -jef
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Grab mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.runlevelzero.net/mailman/listinfo/grab
> 
> -- 
> Greg Kurtzer
> [email protected]
> http://www.runlevelzero.net
> LINUX,... The choice of a GNU generation!
> :wq
> _______________________________________________
> Grab mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.runlevelzero.net/mailman/listinfo/grab

-- 
Greg Kurtzer
[email protected]
http://www.runlevelzero.net
LINUX,... The choice of a GNU generation!
:wq