Re: Problems with Redhat 9

--=-eHA0s0aDRWAzMFwMY/Bo
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 16:29, Greg Kurtzer wrote:

>    - I have to reinstall about 70 production systems before January 1st (=
total=20
>      EOL'ed RH systems by Jan in our organization is approx 500). (this a=
lso
>      means I don't have time to do things like GRAB)

> Sorry for the rant, it is just that this is driving me crazy. I have to b=
uild
> 4 clusters by the end of the year, and I am still fighting with the quest=
ion
> (What OS should I install?)! Our standard last month was RedHat 7.3 for a=
ll
> servers, but that means that we will have to upgrade to 9 by Jan! Conside=
ring

Being mostly a Debian user forced over to Redhat the comment about being
forced to upgrade caught my eye. Do you have any information or a URL
that you can share with me about Redhat forcing an upgrade?=20

Reason I ask is I did some poking via google and over at Redhats website
and didn't see and end-of-life announcement for rh7.3. =20

	Yazz

--=20
 Yazz D. Atlas <[email protected]>             [ O | S | D | N ]      =20
 Senior Systems Engineer / Senior BOFH   http://www.osdn.com=20
     gpg --keyserver  wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 0x0C57DDA0=20
     GPG: 644C E9FF D0AF 3C5E 5C73 5E05 00EF C7EC 0C57 DDA0

--=-eHA0s0aDRWAzMFwMY/Bo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+lMBzAO/H7AxX3aARAmM2AJwK4ZeHNbf6LsU8FjEXe48UlWDM1QCfdTH2
U2wNIqhNxbYBA31gO2kfOiM=
=gWhe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-eHA0s0aDRWAzMFwMY/Bo--