Re: SH 4.0 vulnerabilities

I've definately seen a huge reduction in value in Stronghold since C2Net 
was bought. I've stopped using it on my production servers.  The only 
reason to buy it before was because of the support company behind it. 
 C2Net was responsive and eager to resolve any issues.  At the time they 
were one of my favorite vendors.  Since RedHat, I've stopped using 
Stronghold and reverted to stock apache + mod_ssl.

Gavin M. Roy
Just Sports USA

Tuc wrote:

>>What  a disappointment.  It doesn't say much for RedHat.  When you 
>>purchase a product, you should at expect that all the old, known 
>>vulnerabilities should be removed.
>>
>>    
>>
>	Don't even start..... If you think YOU have problems with them
>and their support, talk to me. You'll seem like your living in paradise.
>Dropped/bungled/"Leave us alone, we never said you could upgrade it"/
>"We don't support PHP4 {Then why do you ship with it, wheres the source?!}"...
>
>	And I pay for support!
>
>		Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Stronghold-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stronghold-users
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>Scanned by Sophos Anti-Virus v3.59TPOS, MIMEDefang v2.19,
>and Spam Assassin v2.31 on satchel.bteg.net
>  
>





---------------------------------------------------------
Scanned by Sophos Anti-Virus v3.59TPOS, MIMEDefang v2.19,
and Spam Assassin v2.31 on satchel.bteg.net