Re: FSF information (was : Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 licenseoption)
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:03:56 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 23:02, [email protected] wrote: > I bet this thread would get more notice on the taroon release mailing list > :) or maybe not. The people you think you want to reach with these complaints/rants will not read either mailinglist anyway, all it'll achieve is to make said mailinglist useless to everyone else. I for one get a LOT of email on a day, and while I current read the taroon mailinglists and try to answer technical inquiries that are in my area, I won't waste my time if these lists are so full of off topic and misdirected flamewars. I'm not saying the points raised don't have merit, but these lists aren't the right place for them.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/nmk8xULwo51rQBIRAvlDAJwPq1h+LVggbE/MN87sKFwr0woXwQCeKlm+ sACfv9Zuzw+Y/7Yon5aPMFM= =5e4o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----