Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 1 *Beta* AvailabilityAnnoun cement

John Haxby wrote:
> Tim Powers wrote:
> 
>>
>> First, it's safe to consider the changed packages in Update 1 as a 
>> collection of erratas.
>>
>> If a package requires an errata of any kind and the package has been 
>> released as an errata previously, then the new errata will be based 
>> off of the latest package (in this case what was already released as 
>> an errata).
>>
>> If a package requires an errata and there are no previous erratas for 
>> that package, then the errata will be based off of the original GA'ed 
>> package.
> 
> 
> Makes sense to me.   However, I'm reminded of that old self-referential 
> appendix on page 395 of a book.   Here's the complete page:
> 
> -------------------
> Appendix E: Errata
> 
> p395:  For "Errata", read "Erratum"
> -------------------

Bah. Quit messing with my reality.


-- 
Tim Powers
Technical Lead, Release Engineering
Red Hat, Inc.


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list