Re: Request for bigger block devices (LVM)
Don MacAskill <redhat-taroon-nfKECZwBYRZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:29:46 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Along these same lines, it'd be nice if the filesystems could function well with large disks, too. ext3 really needs the htree patch to make large directories work. Better yet, XFS and/or JFS support would be fantastic. (Given a choice, I'd choose XFS) I'm really loving my RHEL3 purchases except for this one thing. I was a little shocked to find out that an 'Enterprise' offering was limited to 1TB block sizes (even on 64bit platforms!) and small directories, and it's certainly put a cramp in our product design. But I understand these things take time, so I'll tough it out. Don Erik Bussink wrote: > At 15:05 09/01/2004 -0800, Don wrote: > > Any movement on supporting bigger block devices would be really > appreciated. > > I second that. I was planing to build my new fileserver with RHEL3, but > I'm now > following the Gentoo path. > > cdimage distfiles # pvdisplay /dev/sda3 > --- Physical volume --- > PV Name /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 > VG Name vol00 > PV Size 1.68 TB [3610496295 secs] / NOT usable 32.38 MB > [LVM: 343 KB] > PV# 1 > PV Status available > Allocatable yes > Cur LV 8 > PE Size (KByte) 32768 > Total PE 55090 > Free PE 53454 > Allocated PE 1636 > PV UUID cQtN3N-XmXP-CfGk-8DRn-04OP-QY35-3HSk8M > > cdimage distfiles # pvdisplay -help > Logical Volume Manager 1.0.7 > Heinz Mauelshagen, Sistina Software 28/03/2003 (IOP 10) > > -- > Erik Bussink [email protected] www.bussink.ch > perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), > oct(115), 10);' > > > -- > Taroon-beta-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list