Re: IBM EM64T blades and SMP kernel panics
Brian Long <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:58:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1099486726.5620.23.camel@brilong-lnx> |
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 00:11, Abhijit Karmarkar wrote: > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > (and do not use the x86-64 kernels, they are for amd64 machines which > > have a slightly different instruction set) > > Are you saying that we need different kernel binaries/images/rpms for > AMD's 64-bit processor (x86_64) and Intel's EM64T ? > > We dont do this (atleast i've not yet seen it) in the 2.6 world? > > Can you please explain. Anhijit, You really should RTM for RHEL 3 Update 2 when the EM64T (ia32e) was first supported: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/release-notes/as-amd64/RELEASE-NOTES-U2-x86_64-en.html Specifically, read the section titled "Kernel-Related Information" which explains the differences between the AMD64 and EM64T CPUs. As long as your kickstart image contains both the x86_64 and ia32e kernel RPMs, anaconda chooses which one to install automatically. /Brian/ -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list