Re: IBM EM64T blades and SMP kernel panics

Brian Long <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:58:46 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Message-ID <1099486726.5620.23.camel@brilong-lnx>
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 00:11, Abhijit Karmarkar wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > (and do not use the x86-64 kernels, they are for amd64 machines which 
> > have a slightly different instruction set)
> 
> Are you saying that we need different kernel binaries/images/rpms for 
> AMD's 64-bit processor (x86_64) and Intel's EM64T ?
> 
> We dont do this (atleast i've not yet seen it) in the 2.6 world?
> 
> Can you please explain.

Anhijit,

You really should RTM for RHEL 3 Update 2 when the EM64T (ia32e) was
first supported:

http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/release-notes/as-amd64/RELEASE-NOTES-U2-x86_64-en.html

Specifically, read the section titled "Kernel-Related Information" which
explains the differences between the AMD64 and EM64T CPUs.  As long as
your kickstart image contains both the x86_64 and ia32e kernel RPMs,
anaconda chooses which one to install automatically.

/Brian/

--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list