Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option
Tom Diehl <tdiehl-Vm+IDG5ujV1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:59, Jonathan Schatz wrote: > > > we've been trying that here. unfortunately (at least for 2.1), we've > > never managed to get a _single_ kernel rpm to compile. which makes our > > life difficult, since our software ships with pre-compiled kernel > > modules for every distribution we support. > > Just a stupid question... did you perform a "make mrproper" before > trying to compile the kernel? In the past, I've had problems compiling > RHL kernels if I didn't run a "make mrproper" before starting the > compilation. If you are building rpms with "rpmbuild --rebuild kernel-2.4.9-whatever.src.rpm" it takes care of all of that for you. As I said in an earlier post the enterprise kernel.src.rpms supplied with either 2.1AS distro or the 2.4.9 series errata kernels given the correct environment build just fine. I suspect that the problem is not building them in the proper environment (wrong compiler etc.). I could be wrong though. :-) HTH, -- ......Tom Registered Linux User #14522 http://counter.li.org tdiehl-Vm+IDG5ujV1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected] My current SpamTrap -------> [email protected] -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list