Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option

Féliciano Matias <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le sam 30/08/2003 à 15:09, John a écrit :
> On Saturday 30 August 2003 19:59, Féliciano Matias wrote:
> > $349 + $96/year is a very very attractive price !
> > Check all the good things there are in the box :
> > - development tools
> > - desktop (mail, browser, office suite, ...)
> > - source
> > - server service (bind, mail, web, database, ...)
> 
> There is no licence charge for those, they're given away by their authors for 
> free. A charge for distribution, documentation and support is reasonable.
> 

You can build a distribution like RHEL (6 arch) for $0 ?
Do you know how many people involve around the Debian distribution ?

And remember that RHL is free of charge.

> 
> > - support
> 
> There's the problem. For many people, Red Hat does not offer a support package 
> they want.

What do you want ?
A better support or a less expensive support ?
It seems to me that this thread is mostly around the price. If the price
is not right to you, pick another distribution.
If you find better than RHEL offer, that's great and perhaps RedHat will
change somethings.
If you can't find better than RHEL offer, this means that RedHat is
right.


-- 
Féliciano Matias <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/UKqpAlHlXNHHbFMRAhZ2AJ9XnjZzDvq9WZrnwlTjN8gOQk8gnQCg+nvc
fO4DCQabDnuzLKJ4WU/wvfM=
=pI3B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.