Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option
"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <1062376241.5199.31.camel@zorak> |
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 13:37, [email protected] wrote: > Also not wanting to start a flamewar, I thank you for the good info. I > did not realize the GPL allowed for this, but now that I think about it I > can't remember seeing anything in the GPL that would restrict RedHat from > this. I am curious, is one required to renew the annual RHEL if they wish > to continue using RedHat Advance Server, it appears from your quote that > this is so? IANAL, but I know we ran our RHEL subscription agreements and contracts by the FSF before introducing it, and they did not have any problems with it. If you've got questions like this, I highly recommend you send them to [email protected] They are about the only people who can give a definitive answer. ~spot -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list