Re: more RHEL3 up2date failures
Adrian Likins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:26:04PM -0400, Tim Powers wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 14:20, Matt Domsch wrote: > > Different from what has been previously reported: > > > > > Remove all of the packages listed in this mail: > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/taroon-beta-list/2003-September/msg00148.html > > > > Done, they're all removed. > > > > # up2date -u -f > > (lots of stuff) > > kdenetwork-3.1.3-1.4.i386.r ########################## Done. > > kdenetwork-3.1.3-1.4.src.rp ########################## Done. > > kdenetwork-devel-3.1.3-1.4. ########################## Done. > > kdenetwork-3.1.3-1.4.src.rp ########################## Done. > > kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.i386. ########################## Done. > > kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.src.r ########################## Done. > > krb5-libs-1.2.7-18.i386.rpm ########################## Done. > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 1150, in ? > > sys.exit(main() or 0) > > File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 748, in main > > fullUpdate, dryRun=options.dry_run)) > > File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 1015, in batchRun > > batch.run() > > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2dateBatch.py", line 73, in run > > self.__getPackages() > > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2dateBatch.py", line 139, in __getPackages > > up2date.getPackage(pkg, wrapperUtils.printPkg, wrapperUtils.printRetrieveHash) > > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2date.py", line 327, in getPackage > > progressCallback) > > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpcServer.py", line 160, in doCall > > pkgName = "%s-%s-%s.%s" % (pkg[0], pkg[1], pkg[2], pkg[4]) > > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rhnChannel.py", line 50, in __getitem__ > > return self.dict[item] > > KeyError: 0 > > That's new. Please file a bug against up2date. Thats old ;-> try the more recent up2date from http://people.redhat.com/alikins/up2date/severn/RPMS/ (its says for severn, but it's fine on taroon) Unless of course, that is the most recent version (didnt see a version mentioned in this thread) then, yeah, it's new... Adrian -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list