Re: Attn: ia64 testers

Why are all of these packages being removed?

This seems to indicate that 32-bit compatibility support for ia64 will be
_far_ less comprehensive than for amd64. Is that the intent?

I'd like to hear what Red Hat's statement is going to be regarding 32-bit
support on both 64-bit platforms.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 timp-MXGmwZn/[email protected] wrote:

> The following i386 arch packages need to be removed from your ia64
> installs to insure up2date will function properly with the current
> push. Please note that not all of the packages listed below will be
> effected by the current push, but most certainly glibc-devel will
> surface as a prroblem.
>
> I will be sending the changelogs for the latest push to RHN
> shortly.
>
> XFree86-Mesa-libGL
> XFree86-devel
> XFree86-libs
> compat-db
> compat-gcc-c++
> cracklib
> cups-libs
> cyrus-sasl
> db4
> emacspeak
> expat
> festival
> fontconfig
> freetype
> gdbm
> glib
> glibc-devel
> gpm
> krb5-libs
> krbafs
> libacl
> libattr
> libgcc
> libgcj
> libjpeg
> libobjc
> libpng
> libstdc++
> libstdc++-devel
> libtermcap
> libtiff
> ncurses
> ncurses-devel
> nss_ldap
> openldap
> openoffice
> openoffice-i18n
> openoffice-libs
> pam
> pam-devel
> pam_krb5
> popt
> prelink
> redhat-lsb
> samba
> tcl
> tclx
> tk
> zlib
> zlib-devel


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list