Re: Oracle 9i - issues == Deal breaker
John Costello <John.Costello-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 12:25 PM 9/15/2003 -0500, Matt Pavlovich wrote: >Any work around for this? We will not standardize on RH ES if we can't >run Oracle 8 and Oracle 9. None that I have had time to work on. Then again, I don't work for Red Hat. :^) Unfortunately, this (wedging Oracle 9 into Red hat) is becoming a lower priority for me as other projects come online. If I have time this week to work on the glibc work-around, I will, but if not then I probably will drop Oracle 9i wedging in favor of getting Mason to work with mod_perl 2. I *hope* to see an announcement from Oracle regarding RHEL 3 soon after RHEL 3 is released to production. Then again, all of my experiences with Oracle and Linux have been troublesom (8i for Linux had Solaris install patches, which made me laugh). On a separate topic, Perl 5.8.1-RC4 compiled without problem on RHEL 3 beta 2. >Matt Pavlovich Cheers, John ---- John Costello, RHCE Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not for my employer. "What if nothing matters? What if everything matters?"--Hobbes "Which would be worse?"--Calvin -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list