Re: Attn: ia64 testers
Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected]
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309171116520.16258@inzcver> |
But that's not quite true is it? The amd64 channel has more ia32 compatibility rpms than the ia64 channel. In fact, the following you listed don't have to be removed as they are still in the x86_64 channel: XFree86-devel compat-db compat-gcc-c++ emacspeak festival glibc-devel libtermcap ncurses-devel openoffice openoffice-i18n openoffice-libs pam-devel tcl tclx tk zlib-devel I'd really like to hear some explanation for why all these packages are disappearing now. And there are sure to be requests - and you can't really say that they can't be looked into at this late date, as the packages were there through large chunks of the beta cycles - for adding some of these packages back to the channels. Otherwise, lots of people will manually install the i386/i686 packages and that'll be a can of worms for everyone involved. On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tim Powers wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 06:51, Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected] wrote: > > And what i386/i686 packages do x86_64 users need to remove? > > > > Looks like at least at a minumum, they need to get rid of openldap and > > popt, or the latest round of updates will fail. > > > > None of the i686 packages need to be removed. The packages I noted in > that mail are what should be removed. > > Tim -- Taroon-beta-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list