Re: Attn: ia64 testers

Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309171116520.16258@inzcver>
But that's not quite true is it? The amd64 channel has more ia32
compatibility rpms than the ia64 channel.

In fact, the following you listed don't have to be removed as they are
still in the x86_64 channel:

XFree86-devel
compat-db
compat-gcc-c++
emacspeak
festival
glibc-devel
libtermcap
ncurses-devel
openoffice
openoffice-i18n
openoffice-libs
pam-devel
tcl
tclx
tk
zlib-devel

I'd really like to hear some explanation for why all these packages are
disappearing now.

And there are sure to be requests - and you can't really say that they
can't be looked into at this late date, as the packages were there through
large chunks of the beta cycles - for adding some of these packages back
to the channels. Otherwise, lots of people will manually install the
i386/i686 packages and that'll be a can of worms for everyone involved.

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tim Powers wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 06:51, Eric.Hagberg-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected] wrote:
> > And what i386/i686 packages do x86_64 users need to remove?
> >
> > Looks like at least at a minumum, they need to get rid of openldap and
> > popt, or the latest round of updates will fail.
> >
>
> None of the i686 packages need to be removed. The packages I noted in
> that mail are what should be removed.
>
> Tim


--
Taroon-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-beta-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.