Re: Will update from taroon beta to RHEL 3 be possible?
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.taroon |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 14:41, Alois Treindl wrote: > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > Well they can seriously think about it, but it is a damn hard problem. > > You have to remove packages that were deprecated which can break things > > that you as a user were depending on. My personal opinion as doing RH > > support for 3 years... you end up with more pissed off customers when > > you 'try to support' it than you get from telling them to do a fresh > > install. > > > > I understand the complexity of the problem to update an OS installation. > > But Redhat does support upgrades from RHEL 2.1 to RHEL 3, which is a > much bigger step then from RHEL 3beta to RHEL 3. > > It should be comparatively simple. RHEL2.1 is a nice fixed target with all packages guaranteed to be older. RHEL3beta... there have been a few and also it's a matter of "which day of RHN".. the number of variables and variants explodes that way. As I said, it'll probably work, but we're not guaranteeing it nor will any issues that may result fall under the SLA.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/du97xULwo51rQBIRAutOAKCRXF2w2FCFeKFv+A3USu5KmsqJbwCeKdqv 6MB7SViQ+mxdXbXMVOq2by8= =ghK+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----