Re: Will update from taroon beta to RHEL 3 be possible?

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.taroon
Organization Red Hat, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 14:41, Alois Treindl wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Well they can seriously think about it, but it is a damn hard problem. 
> > You have to remove packages that were deprecated which can break things 
> > that you as a user were depending on. My personal opinion as doing RH 
> > support for 3 years... you end up with more pissed off customers when 
> > you 'try to support' it than you get from telling them to do a fresh 
> > install.
> > 
> 
> I understand the complexity of the problem to update an OS installation.
> 
> But Redhat does support upgrades from RHEL 2.1 to RHEL 3, which is a 
> much bigger step then from RHEL 3beta to RHEL 3.
> 
> It should be comparatively simple.

RHEL2.1 is a nice fixed target with all packages guaranteed to be older.
RHEL3beta... there have been a few and also it's a matter of "which day
of RHN".. the number of variables and variants explodes that way. As I
said, it'll probably work, but we're not guaranteeing it nor will any
issues that may result fall under the SLA.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/du97xULwo51rQBIRAutOAKCRXF2w2FCFeKFv+A3USu5KmsqJbwCeKdqv
6MB7SViQ+mxdXbXMVOq2by8=
=ghK+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.