Re: 4.3.0-5 patch

Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.xfree86
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Mark Knecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 09:58, Aaron Wade wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a radeon 9000 on RH 9 and I just installed the 4.3.0-5 patch
> to try to 
> > get my xinerama config working.  unfortunately it didn't quite do
> the trick.  
> > It must be somewhere in my config.  I have pasted the config here
> for people 
> > to look over.  What I have found odd, is that when I check the
> XFree86.0.log 
> > file it is complaining about PCI:1:5:1 which it has never done.  I
> have tried 
> > to edit the configuration for that device and nothing has changed. 
> 
> > Anyone have words of wisdom ?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > ---snip---
> > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0
> > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
> PCI:1:5:1) found
> > --snip--
> 
> I'm seeing something similar also:
> 
> (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
> (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
> (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
> PCI:1:0:1)
> found
> 
> They two pieces seem to  correspond to the lspci info. I presume the
> Radeon 9000 muct be a multifunction device:
> 
> [root@localhost root]# lspci
> <SNIP>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250
> If
> [Radeon 9000] (rev 01)
> 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 [Radeon
> 9000] (Secondary) (rev 01)
> <SNIP>
> 
> OK, I don't use the dual head stuff, but I sort of wonder about one
> thing in your config file:
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > 
> > Section "Device"
> > 	Identifier  "Radeon-vga"
> > 	Driver      "radeon"
> > 	VendorName  "Videocard vendor"
> > 	BoardName   "ATI Radeon 9000"
> > 	BusID       "PCI:1:5:0"
> > 	Screen	0
> > EndSection
> > Section "Device"
> > 	Identifier "Radeon-dvi"
> > 	Driver     "radeon"
> > 	VendorName "Videocard vendor"
> > 	BoardName  "Ati Radeon 9000"
> > 	BusID      "PCI:1:5:0"

based on your lspci, shouldn't these be PCI:1:0:0?


> > 	Screen     1
> > EndSection
> > 
> > 
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> Should the second of these two maybe use PCI:1:5:1?
> 
> BEWARE!! I have ZERO experience in this area!!
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com



_______________________________________________
xfree86-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list
IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.