男の子との経験がなくたって【-TOPDANDY-】だったら、

Spam detection software, running on the system "blaine.gmane.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.

Content preview:  $B"'M30a(B $B!J>\:Y(BPR$B!K1\Mw"'(B http://e7otndryx6k6.biz/%7eta/page/PC:14312895a2547dd5eb10/IC:VDMQ1kSt9fPGWKwz3r58/IP:MjU2Mw==/?guid=ON
   $B%@!<%j%s$H$N7P83$,<B8=$7$A$c$&$s$@$b$s"v(B $BM30a$+$i$7$?$i!"$9$C$C$4$/4r$7$$$J(B(*^$B"&(B^*)
   $BAa$/%@!<%j%s$K7P83$5$;$F$b$i$C$F!"(B $BM30a$b=w$N;[email protected]$7$F!"(B
   $B=w@-$K$J$j$?$$"v(B $B=w$N;R$C$F$h$j!"=w@-$C$F8@$o$l$?J}$,!"(B $B$J$s$+Bg?M$C$]$$$7$M"v(B
   [...] 

Content analysis details:   (5.9 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.7 URIBL_BLACK            Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
                            [URIs: e7otndryx6k6.biz]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                            trust
                            [147.251.58.75 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.5 FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL    From: domain has series of non-vowel letters
 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                            domains are different
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0022]
 1.4 PYZOR_CHECK            Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
 0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                            [cf: 100]
 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
                            above 50%
                            [cf: 100]
 0.3 DIGEST_MULTIPLE        Message hits more than one network digest check
 0.6 INVALID_MSGID          Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822