Re: Hallelujah! Hspell 1.0 is released.

Diego Iastrubni <[email protected]> Wed, 17 May 2006 10:24:20 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.linux.region.israel.ivrix.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
=E1=E9=E5=ED =F8=E1=E9=F2=E9, 17 =E1=EE=E0=E9 2006, 10:10, =F0=EB=FA=E1 =F2=
=EC =E9=E3=E9 Nadav Har'El:
> ...
>
> From your description, it appears that this "alternatives" mechanism (w=
hich
> like Dan, I wasn't even aware of), is perhaps well-suited for system
> software (e.g., choosing between Sendmail and Postfix, or between MySQL=
 and
> Postgresql) but I don't see how it is relevant for user-level software,
> like which spell-checker to use. If changing the spell-checker to use
> requires modifying links, how can multiple users use this system
> concurrently?
It's incredible how much the Debian hacks have got into other distributio=
ns.=20
Even more incredible, that most of us don't even know they exist (it's on=
ly=20
my 2nd time I am using this system).

> The "alternatives" system you mention could become useful (in my opinio=
n)
> if instead of linking to one of the alternatives, the program could lin=
k to
> a script which chooses one of the alternatives based on run-time criter=
ia,
> such as an environment variable. If "alternatives" don't provide that
> feature, it's not too hard to write a script that does provide it
> (multispell itself comes close).

If you set the alternative to "multispell", you can always use ~/.multisp=
ellrc=20
for having different options per user. As you said,  modifying multispell=
 to=20
know about environment variables should not be that hard.

I have a working spec, if you want to test it, just tell me and in no tim=
e it=20
will be on your inbox.=20

=E0=E9=E6=E4 =E9=E5=F4=E9, =E1=E3=E9=F7=E4 =E0=E9=E5=E8 =EE=F9=E5=EC=E1=FA=
 =E1=CEkmail...  =F1=E5=F3 =F1=E5=F3...=20
:)
----
Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il.
To unsubscribe, please send mail to [email protected] wi=
th
only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe