Re: Hallelujah! Hspell 1.0 is released.
Diego Iastrubni <[email protected]> Wed, 17 May 2006 10:24:20 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.region.israel.ivrix.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
=E1=E9=E5=ED =F8=E1=E9=F2=E9, 17 =E1=EE=E0=E9 2006, 10:10, =F0=EB=FA=E1 =F2= =EC =E9=E3=E9 Nadav Har'El: > ... > > From your description, it appears that this "alternatives" mechanism (w= hich > like Dan, I wasn't even aware of), is perhaps well-suited for system > software (e.g., choosing between Sendmail and Postfix, or between MySQL= and > Postgresql) but I don't see how it is relevant for user-level software, > like which spell-checker to use. If changing the spell-checker to use > requires modifying links, how can multiple users use this system > concurrently? It's incredible how much the Debian hacks have got into other distributio= ns.=20 Even more incredible, that most of us don't even know they exist (it's on= ly=20 my 2nd time I am using this system). > The "alternatives" system you mention could become useful (in my opinio= n) > if instead of linking to one of the alternatives, the program could lin= k to > a script which chooses one of the alternatives based on run-time criter= ia, > such as an environment variable. If "alternatives" don't provide that > feature, it's not too hard to write a script that does provide it > (multispell itself comes close). If you set the alternative to "multispell", you can always use ~/.multisp= ellrc=20 for having different options per user. As you said, modifying multispell= to=20 know about environment variables should not be that hard. I have a working spec, if you want to test it, just tell me and in no tim= e it=20 will be on your inbox.=20 =E0=E9=E6=E4 =E9=E5=F4=E9, =E1=E3=E9=F7=E4 =E0=E9=E5=E8 =EE=F9=E5=EC=E1=FA= =E1=CEkmail... =F1=E5=F3 =F1=E5=F3...=20 :) ---- Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il. To unsubscribe, please send mail to [email protected] wi= th only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe