Re: Summary: Which Linux distribution is stable yet up-to-date

> 
> I would recommend against Arch Linux because, like I said, its
> installations can be left in an unusable state if one forgets to update
> it frequently enough. I'm not sure about Void Linux as I never used it.
> 

That's factually incorrect. If you current state is stable, it will
remain stable for eternity as long as no updates are made and you do not
attempy any foolish things like system-wide installations without using
your package manager (why would a stable system become unstable otherwise?)

Of course if you never upgrade you miss out on being on the bleeding
edge of upstream packages, don't receive security updates etc. On an
typical Arch setup it's common to run daily or weekly updates with no
other side affects.

Over the past 3 years I only recall a single severe breakage of my
system due to upgrading that required booting from a rescue USB and
fixing a stupid mistake I made in my bootloader configuration.

_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il